Blog home

Create a 1 to 5 Rating Scale: Examples + Survey Template

Overview: A 1 to 5 rating scale is a survey tool used to measure opinions, perceptions, or attitudes along a five-point format that progresses from negative to positive. It typically includes two negative options, one neutral midpoint, and two positive options. This scale is widely used in satisfaction surveys, feedback forms, personality assessments, and research studies.

Examples of Rating Scale 1-5

Various research uses 1–5 scales to measure different aspects, and these are some of the most common scale examples:

  1. Agreement Scale
    • 1 = Strongly Disagree
    • 2 = Disagree
    • 3 = Neither Agree nor Disagree
    • 4 = Agree
    • 5 = Strongly Agree
  2. Satisfaction Scale
    • 1 = Very Dissatisfied
    • 2 = Dissatisfied
    • 3 = Neutral
    • 4 = Satisfied
    • 5 = Very Satisfied
  3. Frequency Scale
    • 1 = Never
    • 2 = Rarely
    • 3 = Sometimes
    • 4 = Often
    • 5 = Always
  4. Quality Scale
    • 1 = Poor
    • 2 = Below Average
    • 3 = Average
    • 4 = Good
    • 5 = Excellent
  5. Importance Scale
    • 1 = Not at all Important
    • 2 = Slightly Important
    • 3 = Moderately Important
    • 4 = Very Important
    • Extremely Important

Advantages of 1-5 Rating Scales

The rating scale 1-5 is popular for several compelling reasons:

Simplicity and User-Friendliness

Respondents can quickly understand and complete 1-5 scales with minimal cognitive effort. The straightforward numeric progression makes it accessible to individuals across various demographics and education levels. This simplicity leads to higher completion rates and more reliable data.

Balance and Neutrality

The 5-point scale offers a balanced structure with equal positive and negative options, plus a neutral midpoint. This provides respondents with a comfortable range of choices without forcing them into artificial polarization. The neutral option is particularly important when respondents genuinely have no strong opinion.

Quantifiable Results

Unlike open-ended questions, rating scales produce standardized numerical data that can be easily aggregated, averaged, and analyzed. This quantification enables statistical analysis, benchmarking, and trend identification over time.

Effective for Mobile Surveys

The 1–5 scale performs exceptionally well on smaller screens, making it ideal for today’s mobile-first survey environment. Its limited number of response options reduces friction, allowing respondents to select answers quickly and accurately — without needing to pinch, zoom, or scroll. This simplicity helps maintain engagement and improves completion rates on mobile devices.

To leverage this, SurveyKing offers a unique multiple-row rating scale using 1–5 options designed to group related statements in a compact, mobile-optimized format. For example, in an employee satisfaction survey, a section on Career Development might include items such as:

  • Opportunities to apply my talents
  • Opportunities to challenge myself

Grouping similar statements this way not only saves space but also creates a smoother, more intuitive experience for respondents — especially on mobile.

Universal Recognition

The 1-5 scale is widely recognized across cultures and contexts. From customer satisfaction surveys to academic research, respondents are familiar with this format, which reduces confusion and survey abandonment.

When to Use Rating Scales 1-5

The rating scale 1-5 format can be effectively applied in various survey contexts:

Customer Experience Measurement

For measuring customer satisfaction and experiences, 1-5 scales provide clear benchmarks that can be tracked over time. Specific applications include:

  • Product satisfaction ratings
  • Service quality evaluations
  • Website or app usability assessments
  • Post-purchase feedback
  • User experience

Employee Feedback and Engagement

Organizations can gather structured feedback from employees using 1-5 scales to measure:

  • Job satisfaction
  • Management effectiveness
  • Workplace culture perceptions
  • Training program evaluations
  • Work-life balance assessments

Market Research

Researchers use 1-5 scales in market research to quantify consumer perceptions and attitudes:

  • Brand perception studies
  • Product feature evaluations
  • Advertising effectiveness measurement
  • Purchase intention assessments

Academic Research

In academic settings, these scales help quantify subjective responses:

  • Psychological assessments
  • Student evaluations of teaching
  • Course satisfaction surveys
  • Research participant feedback

Single vs. Multi-Level Rating Scales

When designing your survey, you need to choose between single-level and multi-level rating approaches:

Single-Level Rating Scales

A single-level rating scale asks respondents to evaluate one item at a time. These scales can range from 0-10,1-10,1-5 or 1-7. As mentioned, the five-point 1-5 scale is most common for single-level ratings.

The Net Promoter Score (NPS) is a common example. It uses a fixed 0–10 scale to measure likelihood to recommend. Because it’s an industry standard, it’s ideal for benchmarking against other businesses.

When to use it:

  • You only have a few distinct items
  • The items are unrelated or require focused attention

Why it works:

  • Simple to answer
  • Minimizes cognitive load
  • Performs well on mobile
  • Ideal for quick feedback

Multi-Level Rating Scales

Multi-level (or multi-row) rating scales let respondents evaluate multiple related items using the same scale, often grouped under a shared theme (e.g., customer service traits, product features, or team dynamics).

These scales can use various ranges — such as 0–10, 1–10, 1–5, or 1–7 — but if you’re not using a 1–5 scale, you’ll need to set them up using a matrix question.

For a simpler, mobile-optimized alternative, SurveyKing offers a multi-row rating scale that defaults to 1–5 and avoids the complexity of traditional matrix grids.

Note: Multi-row formats can sometimes lead to straight-lining, where respondents select the same score across all items. When analyzing your results, consider identifying and removing straight-line responses during data cleaning to ensure higher data quality.

When to use it:

Use this format when you’re collecting feedback on several related statements that use the same rating scale. You can:

  • Use a matrix-style question (with your chosen scale: 1–5, 1–10, etc.)
  • Or use SurveyKing’s multiple rating scale, optimized for mobile and fixed to 1–5

Why it works:

  • Compact and efficient
  • Allows quick comparison
  • Works well for grouped themes

Caution: Limit to 5 rows or fewer to avoid fatigue. Traditional matrix formats often underperform on mobile especially when using scales larger than 1-5.

Best Practices for Implementing the Rating Scale 1-5

To maximize the effectiveness of your rating scale 1-5, consider these best practices:

Use Clear and Consistent Labeling

Each point on your scale should have a clear, unambiguous label. Maintain consistency in your labeling throughout the survey to avoid confusing respondents. For example, if 5 represents “Strongly Agree” in one question, it should not represent “Strongly Disagree” in another.

Consider Scale Direction

While traditionally 1 is associated with negative responses and 5 with positive ones, some researchers prefer reversing this order. Whatever direction you choose, clearly communicate it to respondents and maintain consistency throughout your survey.

Balance Scale Points

Ensure your scale has an equal number of positive and negative options surrounding a neutral midpoint. This balance helps prevent bias and gives respondents a fair range of choices.

Provide Clear Instructions

Include clear instructions on how to use the scale, especially if your survey includes different types of rating questions. For example: “Please rate your level of agreement with each statement on a scale from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree).”

Optimize for Mobile Responsiveness

Format your rating scales to work well on all devices, especially mobile phones. Use touch-friendly buttons and adequate spacing between options to prevent accidental selections.

Group Related Questions

When using multiple rating scale questions, group related items together to create a cohesive flow. This approach makes it easier for respondents to compare related items and provide consistent ratings.

Include Opt-Out Options When Appropriate

For questions that may not apply to all respondents, consider adding a “Not Applicable” or “Don’t Know” option outside the 1-5 scale. This prevents respondents from selecting the neutral option when they actually have no basis for judgment.

Keep Question Wording Neutral

Avoid leading or biased language in your questions. Neutral wording ensures you’re measuring genuine opinions rather than guiding respondents toward a particular response.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Despite their simplicity, rating scales 1-5 can be implemented poorly. Here are some things to avoid:

Central Tendency Bias

Respondents often avoid extreme ratings (1 or 5) and gravitate toward the middle option (3). To mitigate this:

  • Use clear language that distinguishes between scale points
  • Consider using a 4-point scale when a neutral option isn’t necessary
  • Include open-ended follow-up questions to clarify neutral responses

Acquiescence Bias

Some respondents tend to agree with statements regardless of content. You can minimize this by:

  • Including a mix of positively and negatively worded questions
  • Varying question formats throughout your survey
  • Using validation questions to check for consistent responses

Scale Length Overload

Too many consecutive rating scale questions can lead to respondent fatigue. To prevent this, do the following:

  • Limit the number of rating questions
  • Break up rating questions with other question types
  • Use progress indicators to show the survey completion status

Inconsistent Scale Interpretation

Different respondents may interpret the scale differently. This issue can be avoided by:

  • Clearly labeling each point on the scale
  • Providing examples when appropriate
  • Using consistent language throughout

Over-reliance on the Neutral Option

Be mindful of a high percentage of neutral responses. The inclusion of a neutral point is the subject of ongoing debate in survey methodology.

Those who favor the neutral point argue that it allows respondents to accurately represent their true lack of opinion, preventing them from being pushed towards a positive or negative response when neither reflects their view. This can lead to more honest and accurate data.

If you’re not sure whether to include a neutral point or not:

  • Analyze whether this reflects genuine indifference or potential respondent disengagement or avoidance
  • Consider if the question wording or scale construction might be contributing to this trend

Analyzing Rating Scale 1-5 Data

Once you’ve collected your rating scale data, here’s how to extract meaningful results:

Basic Analysis Techniques

  • Calculate mean scores — The average rating provides a quick overview of the central tendency. For example, an average satisfaction score of 4.2 indicates a generally positive sentiment. It’s important to acknowledge that the 1-5 data rating scale is ordinal, not interval. This influences the choice of statistical tests. While calculating means is common practice, it’s technically more appropriate to use non-parametric statistics in some cases. Most survey platforms include an Excel export with the rating data. We offer Excel consulting services if you need help organizing or quantifying results.
  • Examine response distribution — Look beyond averages to understand how responses are distributed across the scale. A bimodal distribution (peaks at both high and low ratings) might indicate divergent opinions among different respondent groups.
  • Track changes over time — Monitoring mean scores over time helps identify trends and measure the impact of interventions or changes.
  • Create percentage-based metrics — Convert raw scores into percentage-based metrics for easier communication. For example, calculate the percentage of respondents who selected 4 or 5 (Top-2-Box score) as an indicator of positive sentiment.
  • Clean your data – As mentioned, watch for respondents who straight-line their answers — meaning they select the same rating (e.g., all 4s) across all items. This can occur in both single and multi-level rating scales. Straight-lining is often a sign of disengagement or satisficing and should be addressed during your data cleaning process. These responses should generally be removed before starting your analysis. Also, consider identifying speeders (respondents who complete the survey unusually fast). In many cases, straight-liners and speeders overlap — removing them together improves data quality significantly.

Advanced Analysis Approaches

  • Segment analysis — Break down results by demographic or behavioral segments to identify patterns. For example, satisfaction ratings can be compared between different age groups or customer types.
  • Correlation analysis — Examine relationships between ratings on different questions. For instance, does product quality rating correlate with the likelihood to recommend?
  • Gap analysis — Compare importance ratings with performance ratings to identify areas where expectations aren’t being met. This helps prioritize improvement efforts.
  • Statistical significance testing — When comparing groups or time periods, use statistical tests to determine if differences are significant or merely due to random variation.

Row-by-Row vs. Group Analysis

There are two primary approaches to analyzing rating scale data:

Row-by-row analysis — This approach examines each respondent’s pattern of answers across multiple rating questions:

  • Consistency checking — Identify respondents with inconsistent patterns (potential data quality issues).
  • Individual profiles — Create typologies of respondents based on rating patterns.
  • Outlier identification — Find respondents with unusual response patterns for further investigation.

Group analysis — This approach aggregates ratings across all respondents:

  • Item-by-item averages — Compare average ratings across different questions.
  • Composite scores — Combine related items into a single score (requires reliability testing.)
  • Dimension reduction — Use factor analysis to identify underlying dimensions of related items.

Visualization Techniques for Ratig Scale Data

Effective visualization helps communicate rating scale results. A box and whisker plot is particularly valuable for 1-5 rating data as it shows:

  • The median (middle value)
  • The interquartile range (middle 50% of responses)
  • The range of responses
  • Any outliers

Box plots are especially useful when:

  • Comparing distributions across different groups
  • Identifying skewness in your data
  • Visualizing variability and central tendency simultaneously
  • Looking for outliers that might be distorting averages

For example, two questions might have the same mean score of 3.5, but very different distributions — one might be tightly clustered around 3.5, while another might have responses spread across the entire scale. A box plot makes these differences immediately apparent.

Implementing Rating Scales 1-5 in Your Surveys

The template included in this guide includes a single rating question, a multi-level rating question, a Net Promoter Score, and a Matrix to help you understand the various rating options.

When building a survey from scratch or modifying a question, follow these implementation tips:

1. Choose the Right Question Type

SurveyKing offers several rating scale formats:

  • Single rating questions for individual items
  • Matrix rating scales for multiple related items
  • Mobile-optimized Likert scales for better user experience

2. Customize Scale Labels

Tailor your scale labels to match your specific research question. While standard labels work well, customized options might better fit your context.

3. Consider Visual Elements

Enhance understanding with visual cues:

  • Color gradients (red to green)
  • Star ratings for satisfaction questions
  • Emoji scales for emotional responses

4. Set Up Skip Logic

Create personalized survey paths based on rating responses. For example, trigger follow-up questions when respondents give low ratings to understand the reasons behind their dissatisfaction.

5. Choose Effective Collection Methods

The way you distribute your survey can significantly impact response rates and data quality. Try:

QR code distribution:

  • Create a custom QR code survey using our survey builder
  • Customize the QR code design to match your branding
  • Place the QR code on receipts, product packaging, in-store displays, or event materials
  • Track QR code scans to measure engagement from different physical locations

Email distribution:

  • Send personalized email invitations with embedded survey links
  • Schedule automated reminders for non-respondents
  • Track open and completion rates to optimize timing
  • Use anonymous collection methods for sensitive feedback

Website/app integration:

  • Embed the survey directly on your website or app
  • Use pop-up or slide-in survey invitations based on user behavior
  • Target specific user segments based on their activities
  • Consider timing (e.g., post-purchase, after service completion)

Text message (SMS) distribution:

  • Send short survey links via text for immediate feedback
  • Use when targeting mobile users or seeking in-the-moment responses
  • Keep surveys extremely short for this distribution method
  • Consider the timing carefully to avoid being intrusive

Pro tip: For all distribution methods, ensure the first question is engaging and easy to answer to improve overall completion rates.

SurveyKing Usage Metrics:

Since September 2024, the five-point rating scale has been the most popular format on SurveyKing — used in 81% of all rating questions.

A major driver of this trend is our unique multiple-row rating scale, optimized for mobile devices. This format alone was used to collect answers for 2,394 rating statements, making it twice as popular as traditional single-statement rating questions (1,290).

Even when isolating just the single rating questions, the results were clear:

  • 1–5 and 0–10 rating scales were nearly tied, each used about 46% of the time
  • However, only 6% of users manually chose a 10-point scale (e.g., 0–10 or 1–10)

This told us something important: 1–5 isn’t just popular — people actively choose it over the default. So, we made a change! SurveyKing now defaults to 1–5 for all single rating scale questions.

Scale Type Scale Count Percentage
1-5 Multiple Rating Scale2,39465%
Default (0–10)59016%
Manual (0-10)91%
1-10622%
1-558916%
1-7401%
Totals3,684100%

Alternatives to Rating Scale 1–5

1–5 scales aren’t always the best choice. Consider these alternatives for specific survey goals:

1. Expanded Scales (7-point or 10-point)

When you need more granularity, consider:

  • 7-point scales, as they provide more nuance while remaining manageable
  • 10-point scales, which are used within Net Promoter Score (NPS) and customer satisfaction contexts

A 1-10 scale provides greater differentiation between responses and is often preferred when:

  • You need more granular data
  • Your audience is familiar with decimal-based rating systems
  • You’re conducting cross-cultural research where 10-point scales are common

Advantages of 1–10 scales:

  • More precision in measurement
  • Familiar format for many respondents (especially in countries that use decimal-based grading systems)
  • Allows for more nuanced statistical analysis
  • Compatible with the widely used Net Promoter Score methodology

Disadvantages of 1–10 scales:

  • It can be overwhelming with too many options
  • May increase the cognitive load on respondents
  • Often leads to avoidance of extreme values (respondents rarely select 1 or 10)
  • Can be interpreted inconsistently across different respondents

Remember that while 1–10 scales offer more options, they don’t necessarily provide more accurate data. The ideal scale length depends on your specific research goals, audience, and analysis needs.

2. Binary Scales

For simple yes/no assessments, a binary scale can reduce complexity:

  • Yes/No questions
  • True/False statements
  • Agree/Disagree options

3. Semantic Differential Scales

These scales place opposing adjectives at each end of a continuum:

  • Unfriendly ←→ Friendly
  • Difficult ←→ Easy
  • Unreliable ←→ Reliable

4. MaxDiff Analysis

Sometimes, a simple rating scale isn’t enough — especially when you want to uncover true preferences, not just perceived importance.

For example, in an employee survey asking respondents to rate the importance of pay, paid time off, and schedule flexibility, most people will likely rate all three as “important.” That’s not very helpful if your goal is to identify what matters most.

This is where Maximum Difference Scaling, also know as MaxDiff, comes in handy. Instead of rating each item individually, MaxDiff forces respondents to make trade-offs by choosing the most and least important items in a set. This helps reveal prioritized preferences — giving you a much clearer insight into what people truly value.

5. Ranking Surveys

While not as advanced as MaxDiff, ranking surveys offer a simple way to collect ordered input. Instead of rating each item individually, respondents are asked to arrange a short list based on what stands out most to them.

Ranking works well for quick feedback on straightforward topics, such as:

  • Picking a vacation destination
  • Choosing themes for an event
  • Ordering features in a product roadmap
  • Selecting menu options for a catered event

It won’t tell you how much more someone favors one item over another—but it still forces clear decisions. That makes it more useful than a basic rating scale where everything tends to score the same.

6. Slider Scales

For visual appeal and precise measurement, slider scales allow respondents to select any point along a continuous scale — rather than choosing from fixed options.

Sliders can use different scale ranges (e.g., 0–100 or 1–10) and may be presented as either single-item or multi-row formats. However, they can be clunky on mobile devices, where fine adjustments are harder and sliders may not respond well to touch.

Use sliders when visual engagement or high precision is essential — but always test them on mobile before deploying widely.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I create a 1–5 rating scale survey?

To create a 1–5 rating scale survey, start with a straightforward question, define what each number represents, and choose your labels (e.g., “Disagree” to “Agree”). You can use a matrix question with labels for each option, a single rating scale with labels on each end, or, unique to SurveyKing, a multi-row rating scale optimized for mobile devices.

Can I create a 1–5 scale survey for free?

Yes. SurveyKing offers single rating scales, matrix questions, and multi-row ratings as part of the free plan. You can fully customize the question text, labels, and design, no paid upgrade required.

What does a 1–5 rating scale from poor to excellent mean?

This version of the rating scale uses 1 as “Poor” and 5 as “Excellent.” It’s ideal for evaluations where respondents rate overall satisfaction, quality, or performance, and is commonly used in employee, customer, or training feedback.

Is there a template for a 1 to 5 rating scale?

Yes. SurveyKing provides a free 1–5 rating scale survey template you can customize. It includes single rating, multi-row, and matrix question types, making it easy to apply rating scales and adapt them to your study needs.

Allen is the founder and product lead at SurveyKing. A former CPA and government auditor, he brings a deep understanding of data integrity, financial analysis, and user-focused design.

Ready To Start?

Create your own survey now. Get started for free and collect actionable data.

Get Started Now

We have you covered on anything from customer surveys, employee surveys, to market research. Get started and create your first survey for free.